Network Report II
- Joel Rainbow

- Oct 27, 2024
- 4 min read
BCM206 - Assessment 2
BCM206 Network Report – Ella Cooley, Lara Ballantine, Regan Anderson, Joel Rainbow and Elayna Moxey

Network Digital Artefact Introductions:
Introduction
In this network report we will explore the three key moments we collectively experienced in our own digital artefact progression throughout the semester. The moments consist of prioritising quality over quantity when it comes to content creation, how we all learnt to navigate the confusing world of algorithms and data and finally finding our specific niches.
Key Moments
Throughout our discussion, our group realised the value of prioritising quality over quantity in our projects. Initially, many of us aimed to post frequently, believing that regular or lengthy content would build traction. However, we soon recognized that producing content for the sake of posting often led to superficial results. By focusing on meaningful, valuable contributions instead, we fostered deeper engagement with our audiences. This shift mirrors the dynamics of decentralised networks, where authentic interactions thrive over algorithm-driven output. It also aligns with the concept of online tribes, where shared values and high-quality content cultivate strong community bonds. For one member, the switch to shorter duration podcast episodes was the result of this realisation, and they were able to prioritise depth of content over length. Together, we discovered that quality can forge more lasting connections in digital spaces.
Our network also discussed the algorithm and how it had evolved during the time since we had started our DAs. All of our content in the network gets posted on social media on various different platforms but our engagement is reliant on the algorithm, a system with very little known about it but many rules. Members of our network all had varying experiences with the algorithm. One member found that their views rapidly decreased as time progressed which goes against the notion that the algorithm rewards consistency. Another was receiving comments under videos from people who were not the target audience wondering why they were fed this type of content from the algorithm. This directly relates to online tribes but highlights the issue of what happens when the tribe is being stunted by the algorithm itself.

Comment on Regan's Digital Artefact
Another integral moment in our network’s digital artefact progression was the discovery of each individual’s niche. At the start of the semester, many of us were unsure about the specific direction our content should take. Some members had various experiments with broad, varied topics, hoping to attract a wide audience. However, we soon realised that focusing on a particular niche allowed us to cultivate a more dedicated and engaged following. This shift helped streamline our content creation process, as we no longer struggled to create content for a general audience but instead catered to those truly interested in our subject matter. In turn, this improved the quality of feedback we received, also making the project more enjoyable. Overall, embracing our unique niches became instrumental in building authentic online communities, where shared interests fueled meaningful engagement and allowed us to learn more about online tribes and even tied into theories on the splinternet.

The Splinternet is the division of the internet into smaller, isolated networks
Image: The Economist
Summary
Throughout our networking journey, it may be concluded that the application of various concepts, such as quantity over quality, engaging with algorithms and data, and finding our niches, enhanced our overall discussion and thus improved each of our DA’s. By collaborating in this way, we utilised our varied knowledge and applied relevant theories to refine our DA’s, demonstrating the effectiveness of networking groups within projects.
REFERENCES
Adams, T & Smith, SA 2008, Electronic tribes : the virtual worlds of geeks, gamers, shamans, and scammers 1st ed., University of Texas Press, Austin, <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uow/detail.action?docID=3443360>.
Benkler, Y 2007, The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom, Yale University Press, <https://www.scienceopen.com/document_file/aa309e05-cbd6-4306-a570-a6dfc215bb2c/ScienceOpen/08109020701191257.pdf>.
Stallkamp, M 2021, After TikTok: International business and the splinternet, AIB Insights, 21(2), pp.1-5, <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Maximilian-Stallkamp/publication/350594885_After_TikTok_International_Business_and_the_Splinternet/links/606b05cba6fdccad3f751ea7/After-TikTok-International-Business-and-the-Splinternet.pdf>.
Tan, M 2014, Finding a Niche as a Visual Communicator, <https://digitalcommons.wku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1504&context=stu_hon_theses >.













Comments